Last Updated on September 6, 2024

Pavel Durov Responds to French Charges in Detailed Statement

Pavel Durov, CEO of Telegram
Pavel Durov, CEO of Telegram, is pictured onstage at TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2015 on Sept. 21, 2015, in San Francisco.
Steve Jennings/Getty Images for TechCrunch

Telegram CEO Breaks Silence

After a twelve-day silence, Pavel Durov, the CEO of Telegram, has addressed his recent arrest in France through a comprehensive 600-word statement on his Telegram account. He attributes his current predicament to “growing pains” that have made it easier for criminals to exploit the platform. Pavel Durov, the billionaire co-founder and CEO of Telegram, was detained on 25th of August evening at Bourget Airport.

Charges and Accusations

French authorities have accused Durov of facilitating criminal activities on Telegram, including the distribution of child sexual abuse material. At the time of his arrest, Telegram insisted that Durov had “nothing to hide.”

Criticism of French Legal Actions

Durov criticized the French legal system’s approach, arguing that holding a CEO accountable for content posted by third parties is outdated and inappropriate. He suggested that legal action should be directed at the service itself rather than its executive.

Telegram’s Efforts to Enhance Security

Durov acknowledged that managing Telegram has become increasingly complex with its growth. The platform now has 950 million users, and he admitted that these “growing pains” have made it more challenging to prevent misuse. He has committed to improving Telegram’s security measures and has already updated the platform’s FAQ to reflect that private chats are now subject to moderation.

Details of the Arrest and Legal Proceedings

Durov, a citizen of Russia, France, and the UAE, was charged on August 28 in Paris. His bail was set at $5.5 million, and he faces monitoring conditions while remaining in France. He spent four days being questioned by police and has contested the claims that Telegram failed to respond to legal requests. Durov claims that Telegram has a representative in the EU to handle such requests and that French authorities had multiple ways to contact him.

Public Support and Future Plans

Durov received support from tech figures, including Elon Musk, who used the hashtag #FreePavel. Despite the legal challenges, Durov remains hopeful that these events will lead to enhanced safety on Telegram and in the broader social media landscape.

Pavel Durov’s full statment

Thanks everyone for your support and love!

Last month I got interviewed by police for 4 days after arriving in Paris. I was told I may be personally responsible for other people’s illegal use of Telegram, because the French authorities didn’t receive responses from Telegram.

This was surprising for several reasons: 

1. Telegram has an official representative in the EU that accepts and replies to EU requests. Its email address has been publicly available for anyone in the EU who googles “Telegram EU address for law enforcement”. 

2. The French authorities had numerous ways to reach me to request assistance. As a French citizen, I was a frequent guest at the French consulate in Dubai. A while ago, when asked, I personally helped them establish a hotline with Telegram to deal with the threat of terrorism in France.

3. If a country is unhappy with an internet service, the established practice is to start a legal action against the service itself. Using laws from the pre-smartphone era to charge a CEO with crimes committed by third parties on the platform he manages is a misguided approach. Building technology is hard enough as it is. No innovator will ever build new tools if they know they can be personally held responsible for potential abuse of those tools. 

Establishing the right balance between privacy and security is not easy. You have to reconcile privacy laws with law enforcement requirements, and local laws with EU laws. You have to take into account technological limitations. As a platform, you want your processes to be consistent globally, while also ensuring they are not abused in countries with weak rule of law. We’ve been committed to engaging with regulators to find the right balance. Yes, we stand by our principles: our experience is shaped by our mission to protect our users in authoritarian regimes. But we’ve always been open to dialogue.

Sometimes we can’t agree with a country’s regulator on the right balance between privacy and security. In those cases, we are ready to leave that country. We’ve done it many times. When Russia demanded we hand over “encryption keys” to enable surveillance, we refused and Telegram got banned in Russia. When Iran demanded we block channels of peaceful protesters, we refused and Telegram got banned in Iran. We are prepared to leave markets that aren’t compatible with our principles, because we are not doing this for money. We are driven by the intention to bring good and defend the basic rights of people, particularly in places where these rights are violated.

All of that does not mean Telegram is perfect. Even the fact that authorities could be confused by where to send requests is something that we should improve. But the claims in some media that Telegram is some sort of anarchic paradise are absolutely untrue. We take down millions of harmful posts and channels every day. We publish daily transparency reports. We have direct hotlines with NGOs to process urgent moderation requests faster.

However, we hear voices saying that it’s not enough. Telegram’s abrupt increase in user count to 950M caused growing pains that made it easier for criminals to abuse our platform. That’s why I made it my personal goal to ensure we significantly improve things in this regard. We’ve already started that process internally, and I will share more details on our progress with you very soon. 

I hope that the events of August will result in making Telegram and the social networking industry as a whole safer and stronger. Thanks again for your love and memes